Hamlet - Sample
My Account List Orders

Hamlet

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Chapter 1 Setting the Stage: Denmark and the Ghost
  • Chapter 2 Act I, Scene 1 – The Night Watch
  • Chapter 3 Act I, Scene 2 – Claudius’ Court
  • Chapter 4 Act I, Scene 3 – Polonius’ Advice
  • Chapter 5 Act I, Scene 4 – The Ghost’s Revelation
  • Chapter 6 Act I, Scene 5 – Hamlet’s Oath
  • Chapter 7 Act II, Scene 1 – Polonius and Reynaldo
  • Chapter 8 Act II, Scene 2 – Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
  • Chapter 9 Act III, Scene 1 – To Be or Not To Be
  • Chapter 10 Act III, Scene 2 – The Play Within a Play
  • Chapter 11 Act III, Scene 3 – Claudius’ Prayer
  • Chapter 12 Act III, Scene 4 – Closet Scene
  • Chapter 13 Act IV, Scene 1 – Aftermath of Polonius’ Death
  • Chapter 14 Act IV, Scene 2 – Hamlet’s Escape
  • Chapter 15 Act IV, Scene 3 – Claudius’ Plot
  • Chapter 16 Act IV, Scene 4 – Fortinbras’ March
  • Chapter 17 Act IV, Scene 5 – Ophelia’s Madness
  • Chapter 18 Act IV, Scene 6 – Letters from Hamlet
  • Chapter 19 Act IV, Scene 7 – Laertes’ Return
  • Chapter 20 Act V, Scene 1 – The Graveyard
  • Chapter 21 Act V, Scene 2 – The Duel and Finale
  • Chapter 22 Major Themes: Revenge and Justice
  • Chapter 23 Major Themes: Madness and Appearance vs Reality
  • Chapter 24 Character Study: Hamlet
  • Chapter 25 Character Study: Supporting Cast (Gertrude, Ophelia, Claudius, etc.)

Introduction

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet remains one of the most studied—and most challenging—works in the English literary canon. Its dense language, shifting perspectives, and layers of meaning can leave even diligent readers feeling overwhelmed when preparing for examinations or writing analytical essays. This commentary is designed to demystify the play without oversimplifying its richness, offering students a clear, reliable guide that respects both the text’s complexity and the practical demands of academic work.

The primary aim of this book is to serve as a companion to the original play, providing scene‑by‑scene explanations that illuminate Shakespeare’s word choice, dramatic structure, and historical backdrop. Rather than merely retelling the plot, each section highlights key literary devices—such as soliloquy, irony, and motif—and shows how they contribute to the play’s enduring themes. By grounding the analysis in close reading, the commentary helps readers move beyond summary to genuine interpretation, a skill that is essential for success in coursework and exams.

To make the material accessible yet rigorous, the commentary adopts a tone that balances scholarly insight with straightforward language. Concepts are introduced gradually, with frequent references to the original text so that readers can see exactly how each observation is rooted in Shakespeare’s own lines. Where relevant, brief notes on Elizabethan theatre, contemporary sources, and major critical traditions are included to enrich understanding without diverting focus from the primary goal of exam preparation.

Using this book effectively involves active engagement: read the corresponding scene in Hamlet first, then consult the commentary to clarify difficult passages, note important quotations, and consider the analytical questions posed at the end of each section. These questions are deliberately crafted to prompt the kind of thinking examiners look for—evaluating character motivations, tracing thematic development, and assessing the impact of dramatic techniques. Incorporating this practice into your study routine will build both confidence and competence.

Beyond the scene‑by‑scene walkthrough, the latter chapters synthesize the play’s major concerns—revenge, justice, madness, appearance versus reality—and provide focused character studies that draw together insights from across the text. These sections serve as revision tools, allowing you to see patterns and connections that might be missed when examining the play in isolated chunks. They also offer ready‑made outlines for essay planning, helping you to organize arguments swiftly and coherently.

Finally, remember that a commentary is a springboard, not a substitute, for your own critical voice. As you work through the pages, let the explanations stimulate your questions and interpretations rather than replace them. May this guide illuminate the corridors of Elsinore, sharpen your analytical tools, and support you in achieving the academic success you strive for. Happy reading, and may your encounters with Hamlet be as rewarding as they are enlightening.


CHAPTER ONE: Setting the Stage: Denmark and the Ghost

The world that Shakespeare presents in Hamlet is not a vague, timeless kingdom but a specific Danish court steeped in political intrigue and cultural anxieties of the late sixteenth century. While the play’s action unfolds within the stone walls of Elsinore, the playwright draws on a rich tapestry of historical sources, contemporary beliefs, and theatrical conventions to give the setting a palpable sense of place. Understanding this backdrop helps students see why certain motifs recur and why the ghost’s appearance carries such weight for both characters and audience.

Shakespeare’s primary source for the Hamlet story was the twelfth‑century Danish chronicler Saxo Grammaticus, whose Gesta Danorum recounts the legend of Amleth, a prince who feigns madness to avenge his father’s murder. Later, François de Belleforest’s French adaptation of Saxo’s tale added moralizing commentary and heightened the dramatic tension. Although Shakespeare likely never read Saxo directly, he would have encountered Belleforest’s version through English translations that circulated among educated Londoners. These medieval roots provided the playwright with a ready‑made plot of regal betrayal, yet he reshaped the material to suit the tastes and concerns of his Jacobean audience.

Denmark, in Shakespeare’s imagination, functions as a mirror for Elizabethan worries about succession, foreign threat, and the stability of monarchy. The late 1500s saw England grappling with the aftermath of the Spanish Armada, religious unrest, and questions about the legitimacy of rulers who gained power through questionable means. By placing the drama in a Danish court, Shakespeare could critique these issues indirectly, allowing spectators to reflect on their own political climate without the risk of direct censure. The choice of a northern kingdom also evokes a sense of cold, austere grandeur that matches the play’s melancholic tone.

The setting of Elsinore itself is more than a generic castle; it is a locus of surveillance and secrecy. Shakespeare’s stage directions often imply thick walls, echoing corridors, and dimly lit chambers where whispers can travel unseen. This architectural confinement heightens the sense that characters are constantly watched, a feeling that mirrors the espionage prevalent in both Danish and English courts of the period. The fortress becomes a character in its own right, shaping the behavior of those who inhabit it and reinforcing themes of entrapment and obscured truth.

When the ghost first appears, it does so against a backdrop of night mist and the cold sentinel’s watch, a scene that would have resonated strongly with Elizabethan audiences familiar with beliefs about spirits. In the early modern period, the boundary between the natural and supernatural was porous; many people accepted that the souls of the dead could return to warn the living or demand redress. Protestant theology, while officially denying the existence of purgatory, still left room for popular folklore about restless ghosts, especially those who died violently or without proper rites. Shakespeare taps into this cultural milieu, making the specter a credible catalyst for action rather than a mere theatrical gimmick.

The ghost’s armor, described as “the very coinage of your eye,” signals a martial past and invokes the image of a fallen king still clad in the regalia of his former authority. This visual cue would have reminded spectators of the recent memory of King Hamlet’s victorious campaign against Fortinbras of Norway, a detail that underscores the lost honor and disrupted order that now plague the state. By presenting the specter in full battle dress, Shakespeare links the personal tragedy of a murdered father to the larger political malaise afflicting Denmark.

Moreover, the ghost’s insistence that Hamlet avenge his “foul and most unnatural murder” introduces the revenge motive that drives the plot, yet it does so in a way that raises ethical questions. The specter’s demand echoes the conventions of Senecan tragedy, where a supernatural figure urges a protagonist toward bloody retribution. However, Shakespeare complicates this tradition by making the ghost’s veracity ambiguous; characters such as Horatio express skepticism, and Hamlet himself wonders whether the apparition might be a demon sent to tempt him into sin. This doubt encourages the audience to consider the moral ramifications of vengeance, a theme that will be explored in later chapters but whose seeds are planted in the ghost’s first utterance.

The political implications of the ghost’s appearance extend beyond the familial sphere. King Claudius, who has seized the throne and married the widowed queen, rules under a cloud of illegitimacy that the specter’s presence exposes. The ghost’s accusation that Claudius murdered King Hamlet by pouring poison into his ear serves as a public indictment of the new king’s claim to power. In a monarchy where divine right was often invoked to justify rule, the suggestion that a ruler attained office through murder destabilizes the very foundation of authority. This tension between legitimate succession and usurpation mirrors contemporary anxieties about the stability of Elizabeth’s reign and the pretensions of various claimants.

Shakespeare’s choice to open the play with a night watch also serves a practical theatrical purpose. The darkness allows for striking visual effects—such as the ghost’s pale glow against the black backdrop—while limiting the need for elaborate scenery. The audience’s imagination fills in the shadows, making the supernatural encounter feel more immediate and personal. This technique reflects the Elizabethan stage’s reliance on language and minimal props to conjure complex worlds, a fact that students should keep in mind when analyzing how setting influences mood and meaning.

The sentinels who first witness the ghost—Bernardo, Marcellus, and Francisco—represent the ordinary soldiers and citizens whose lives are affected by the decisions of those in power. Their nervous dialogue about the “dreaded sight” establishes a mood of unease that permeates the court. By giving voice to these lower‑ranking figures, Shakespeare underscores that the political turmoil at Elsinore is not confined to the royal family; it filters down through the ranks, affecting the morale and daily routines of everyone within the fortress walls.

Historical records indicate that Denmark during the early seventeenth century was a unified kingdom under the rule of the Oldenburg dynasty, yet it faced periodic tensions with neighboring Sweden and Norway. The looming threat of young Fortinbras’s army, mentioned early in the play, reflects a genuine concern about border security and the potential for foreign invasion. While the main plot focuses on internal corruption, the external menace serves as a reminder that a state weakened by internal strife becomes vulnerable to outside forces—a lesson that would not have been lost on Shakespeare’s contemporaries.

The ghost’s speech also introduces the motif of ears and hearing, a subtle but recurring element throughout the play. When the specter claims that poison was poured into King Hamlet’s ear, the image of auditory violation foreshadows later scenes where words themselves become weapons—whether through deceitful flattery, manipulative rhetoric, or the infamous “mousetrap” play that seeks to catch the king’s conscience. This auditory theme reinforces the idea that truth can be distorted or concealed, a concept that will be examined in later chapters on appearance versus reality.

Students preparing for examinations should note how Shakespeare efficiently establishes multiple layers of conflict within the opening moments: personal grief, political illegitimacy, supernatural uncertainty, and looming foreign threat. Each of these strands intertwines to create a dense web of motivation that propels the characters forward. Recognizing these interlocking pressures enables a more nuanced reading of why Hamlet hesitates, why Claudius is paranoid, and why Gertrude’s loyalties appear divided.

It is also worthwhile to consider how the Elizabethan audience’s understanding of the afterlife shaped their reception of the ghost. While Protestant doctrine officially rejected the idea of purgatory, many laypeople retained Catholic‑inspired beliefs about souls lingering until proper penance was performed. The ghost’s claim that he is “doomed for a certain term to walk the night” aligns with folk ideas of a spirit bound to earth until a wrong is righted. This cultural ambivalence allows Shakespeare to play with audience expectations: the specter can be seen as a genuine restless soul, a demonic trickster, or a manifestation of Hamlet’s own guilt‑laden psyche.

The setting’s cold, northern climate further amplifies the play’s tone of bleak introspection. Long winter nights and short, gray days mirror the emotional landscape of the characters, particularly Hamlet’s pervasive melancholy. This environmental symbolism is not merely decorative; it reinforces the internal states of those who dwell within Elsinore’s walls, suggesting that the external world reflects—and perhaps exacerbates—the turmoil within.

In sum, Chapter One aims to furnish students with a concrete grasp of the historical, cultural, and theatrical conditions that shape the world of Hamlet. By appreciating the Danish setting as a product of both medieval legend and Elizabethan anxiety, readers can better interpret why the ghost’s arrival ignites a chain reaction of doubt, action, and consequence. The ensuing scenes, which will be examined in detail in later chapters, build upon this foundation, using the stark backdrop of Elsinore to explore the depths of human motivation, the specter of revenge, and the ever‑shifting line between appearance and reality. With this framework in mind, the reader is now prepared to step onto the battlements of Elsinore and witness the unfolding drama firsthand.


This is a sample preview. The complete book contains 27 sections.